Friday, April 30, 2010

Gertie, Girl Reporter {4.30.10}

Hey hey, Girl Reporter is back! This is where I channel my inner Lois Lane to bring you the most interesting stuff from my Google Reader for the week. $550 khakis, the latex designer to the stars, and more!

  • In my absolute favorite article of the week, the New York Times looks into why a pair of khakis would possibly cost $550 in fascinating detail. I was prepared to be disgusted, but found myself pleasantly surprised by the amount of workmanship that goes into these pants. The retail mark-ups are ridiculous of course, but they're made in a union shop in Brooklyn which is pretty awesome. (New York Times)
  • Interestingly, Etsy linked to the article above in a newsletter sent to sellers to demonstrate the importance of not under-pricing their wares. I have to admit, this made me stop. Should Etsy sellers consider a 250% mark-up after parts and labor, just like Bergdorf's does? (Etsy)

    [From Etsy's newsletter]

  • But then there's NYT's miss of the week: suggesting that it's okay to wear a biking unitard as an outfit with high boots and a cardigan. It's not okay, people! (New York Times)
  • Meet Aksudo Kudo, the designer responsible for Lady Gaga's latex get-ups. (Salon)
  • You know how brands like Always are often promoting their charitable contributions of feminine products to third world countries? The general understanding is that, in underdeveloped countries, lack of these products keeps girls from attending school while menstruating. According to this article, though, that is only a fraction of the problem. (Jezebel)
  • Love this quote on feminism: "Unlike almost every other social movement, [it's] not a struggle against a distinct oppressor...It's against a deeply held set of beliefs and assumptions...This is the ultimate gift of feminism, that the personal is in fact the political." - Kavita Ramdas (Ted via Jezebel)
  • We may be seeing more plus size models in high fashion these days, but where are the plus-size models of color? (Jezebel)

That's it for this week, folks. Happy Friday!

17 comments:

  1. What a great article on what goes into the making of the khakis. In a world where most people buy mass-produced-in-China clothes, I don't think the average person realizes what goes into the making of a pair of pants. I hope many Etsy sellers do take the time to read the article. As someone who sells on Etsy, it drives me utterly insane how so many sellers completely underprice their goods, and clearly do not take into account the time spent on them!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The cost of quality comes high; the cost of the cloth alone is more than the Gap sells a pair of khakis for. At least the operators get a decent wage for their labors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are so awesome. Best links EVER! Diving in now to get caught up on these fascinating stories!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not even sure the mark-ups were ridiculous.
    Remembering it was marked up twice - once by the manufacturer (fair enough, he needs to make a profit), and once by the retailer (fair enough also, they need to make a profit - think about their overheads, marketing, etc. It's not 'free' for them to bring the goods to market).
    Clearly etsy sellers don't have the same retail costs as a bricks&mortar store, so the situation is a bit different.
    But yes, they should be looking at the breakdown regarding how the manufacturer costs and marks up the goods, and learn from that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. perhaps irrelevant, but also providing a perspective on manufacturing: http://storyofstuff.com/index.php

    ReplyDelete
  6. sorry, meant to post it as a link: story of stuff. Videos and blog about industry manufacturing and economy. One criticism I have heard from others, however, is "textbook liberal agenda."

    ReplyDelete
  7. One plus of sewing, even if you aren't a pro such as yourself, is that you become aware of clothing construction, fit and fabric.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Re: the $550 khakis. They are made by Martin Greene's facility in Brooklyn and I'm not even sure that if you were able to split off the cost/price of the pants from one of Greene's suit, they'd be $550. I think there is a bit of 'we do because we can' in this, but I'm still very glad to see that someone is making something in the US. small bit of news: the Hugo Boss suit factory in Cleveland is still open. The company threatened to close it down and move production to Eastern Europe - oh, they WERE making plenty of money there. The production was very profitable - it's just that they could make MORE by moving it to Eastern Europe. Ultimately the decision was made (under public pressure, the campaign for stars on the red carpet NOT to wear Boss tuxedos AND say so publicly, which they did and so on)to keep the facility open but I'm sure we will hear about this again.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I WISH I could charge more on Etsy. But then I wouldn't sell anything. Mommas of little girls don't want to spend more for their daughter's Barbie clothes than they do for their daughter's clothes, even if they are better constructed. :(
    http://modestbarbie.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  11. Re: plus sized models. How many different "types of women" must be represented by the fashion industry for us "real women" to be satisfied? How about petite models? Petite but plus sized models of color? Do they even exist?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Not sure how I feel about etsy telling people to charge more....I guess i feel conflicted. But I think I lean more towards the fact that it's a mainstream venue- for the eveyday folks. And honestly- I often just about choke when I see a bunch of t-shirts marked up to $50-80 bucks. Just makes me wonder who on earth has $80 to pay for a shirt and would buy it off etsy? Isn't there a different market...say at boutiques? Also my big problem is that to ask someone to pay that much for most of your items you'd have to truly and utterly claim that the design/concept/ whatever is COMPLETELY yours. No "inspired by" or influenced from other designers. If you are making something influenced by those designers for the mere mortals (at an affordable price) then fine. But basically I'm thinking- don't kid yourself. Especially if you got the idea from someone else on etsy or from claires or anthropologie. Just sayin.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's no wonder we have so much "stuff" - the price of the basics has been depressed so much. I've got a home ec book from 1962, and in it is an example wardrobe budget. Converting it to 2010 dollars:

    Winter coat: $360
    2 sweaters: $86
    School shoes: $58
    Underwear and hosiery: $36
    Wool gloves or mittens: $22
    White blouse: $43
    Dry cleaning and shoe repair upkeep expenses for the year: $36

    (btw "Linda" decided to knit her own mittens and put off the white blouse until spring so that she had $144 left of her budget to buy a formal dress!)

    Can you imagine? I think my mother would have fainted dead away if our back-to-school clothing budget went over $150, including winter coat, and that was a lot closer to 1962 than we are now!

    ReplyDelete
  14. I also read that Times article about the khakis. It sort of bugs me that the focus is on such a high-end item, as if that's what any good quality, union-made garment will cost.

    I'd like to know what a pair of khakis equivalent in quality to a pair from the Gap might cost if made in the USA with union labor. Probably not less than $100 but not $550 either, right?

    Anyway, as long as there's the Gap, H&M, etc., the vast majority will never spend that kind of money on clothes -- and probably couldn't if they wanted to.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hmm...off to read the NYT articles. Interesting about the etsy newsletter. The challenge with etsy, I think, is that there will always be a mix of "pro" sellers and "hobby" sellers. Not everyone on there wants to quit their day job and sell full time -- many are simply destashing supplies, selling as a hobby, or crafting for fun and delighting in the thrill of a sale. For these sellers, there's a motive to price lower -- which makes it much harder for the full time sellers.

    ReplyDelete
  16. ACK! I think it's telling that there's no picture of someone IN a unitard in that NYT blurb! No, no, no! I wore unitards in my teenage ballet days -- ONLY in class and ONLY on "skinny" days preceded by handfuls of caffeine pills and salad! (Lovely, huh?)

    ReplyDelete
  17. I gotta agree with Amy & Dana. Back when I did art or craft shows I priced by factoring in the cost of my materials, plus my time. People just aren't willing to pay a handcrafter what they're worth when they can get something similar made in China and sold at the Sprawl*Mart for a fraction of what an Etsy type wants to charge. We've created a culture where "cheap" is valued more than "handmade" or "custom-designed". It's sad - and it makes it harder on creative types trying to make a living with their handwork.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for your comments; I read each and every one! xo Gertie

© Gertie's Blog For Better Sewing. Powered by Cake